essbeejay: stock: raven (Default)
essbeejay ([personal profile] essbeejay) wrote2010-06-15 07:33 pm

I'm totally a grown-up, really.

If my pairing were a Converse, this would be them.

I'm bigger on the idea of a nested shoe more than I am on the actual look of it. I like the idea of Blossom on the outside, and there's more white than black on the shoe because in both cases if I switch it up it looks too much like Brick is dominating and I don't play a deck with those kinds of cards in it. But the look is just way too busy and complicated. I'll probably revisit with the regular Converse, but make it more subtle (read: SOMETHING FUCKING WEARABLE). And of course I'll post my dickery here.

Not crazy about the "personal id" text id'ing the pairing, but I will say it looks marginally better in lowercase, which I can't seem to get the customizer to do. Boo.

Also going to mess with the Blues and Greens when I get the chance (both the crazy nested versions, just for kicks, AND the versions that would actually function as wearable shoes).

I'm a nerd and I motherfucking love it

[identity profile] juxtaposie.livejournal.com 2010-06-17 05:06 am (UTC)(link)
Am I in crack? Why can't I see your reply?

[identity profile] essbeejay.livejournal.com 2010-06-17 07:12 am (UTC)(link)
Oh what the balls. I think I inadvertently deleted it when I was tooling around with the layout changes lj made.

ANYWAY. basically what I said was WATCH THE ENABLING, I PURCHASED THREE PAIRS OF CONVERSES THE OTHER DAY AND THERE IS NO REASON TO ENCOURAGE ME

[identity profile] juxtaposie.livejournal.com 2010-06-17 08:02 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, you're right about there being no reason to encourage you. YOU'VE ALREADY GONE AND DONE WHAT I WOULD HAVE ENCOURAGED YOU TO DO. CLEARLY YOU DON'T NEED MY HELP!

But I mean, a girl's gotta have shoes amirite?