essbeejay: stock: raven (Default)
essbeejay ([personal profile] essbeejay) wrote2010-03-27 02:01 am
Entry tags:

I'm sorry, I guess I missed something

But since when did "original pairings" come to mean "better stories?"

I make an effort to avoid being overly negative on this lj (God knows there's enough of that already), so I'm probably going to regret saying all this shit later, but is that seriously a prerequisite for a good story these days? An "original pairing?" That's interesting, because I thought there might be other qualifying factors, like a strong narrative, or a nicely paced plot, or, hm, maybe well-developed characters, perhaps?

This isn't just an issue I have with fandom. This is an issue I have with any film, any book, any TV show that goes out and says, "I'm gong to do something different and original!" and then winds up sucking because you dumbass writer/director/producer-type decided that so long as you had an "original" concept, you didn't need to focus on any other aspect of the film/book/show that might actually make it palatable and worth my time.

Originality is an excellent thing, don't get me wrong, but it is not the sole basis on which you can (or should) judge the value of a creative work, especially when it comes to anything involving writing.

Of course, what makes something "better" is subjective. But to be that dismissive and arrogant about it? Frankly, I find it pretty fucking aggravating. And pretentious. Get off your high horse and just do as you do. I don't have a problem with which characters you want sucking each other's faces, so maybe you should quit copping an attitude about the rest of us.

W/E, just W/E, you guys. I'm having the painters in soon, so I'm allowed to be moody >8C

[identity profile] crystallinearmy.livejournal.com 2010-03-31 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm becoming increasingly jealous of your icons.

I remember when I had a really, really thick head and ignored the technicalities. Now, my eyes are more opened, and I start picking out the little things.
Agreed. If it's nothing major, I just ignore it (because a friend and I have found some minor plot holes in some PpG episodes).

I remember watching a super terrible movie not too long ago. One of the things that enraged me so was a giant plot-hole. A girl drowned her grandmother's antique car in quicksand. It was completely submerged in quicksand and everything. But she and her friend only talked about for five minutes after it happened...then it's no longer mentioned in the plot. The parents don't punish her, the grandmother doesn't care about losing her only car, and no one even mentions it after the girl gets home. Excuse me, but isn't nearly destroying/losing a car, not to mention an antique one, a big deal? How was it so easily forgotten?

[identity profile] xjabooo.livejournal.com 2010-04-03 09:07 am (UTC)(link)
Why, thank you. :3