essbeejay: stock: raven (Default)
essbeejay ([personal profile] essbeejay) wrote2010-03-27 02:01 am
Entry tags:

I'm sorry, I guess I missed something

But since when did "original pairings" come to mean "better stories?"

I make an effort to avoid being overly negative on this lj (God knows there's enough of that already), so I'm probably going to regret saying all this shit later, but is that seriously a prerequisite for a good story these days? An "original pairing?" That's interesting, because I thought there might be other qualifying factors, like a strong narrative, or a nicely paced plot, or, hm, maybe well-developed characters, perhaps?

This isn't just an issue I have with fandom. This is an issue I have with any film, any book, any TV show that goes out and says, "I'm gong to do something different and original!" and then winds up sucking because you dumbass writer/director/producer-type decided that so long as you had an "original" concept, you didn't need to focus on any other aspect of the film/book/show that might actually make it palatable and worth my time.

Originality is an excellent thing, don't get me wrong, but it is not the sole basis on which you can (or should) judge the value of a creative work, especially when it comes to anything involving writing.

Of course, what makes something "better" is subjective. But to be that dismissive and arrogant about it? Frankly, I find it pretty fucking aggravating. And pretentious. Get off your high horse and just do as you do. I don't have a problem with which characters you want sucking each other's faces, so maybe you should quit copping an attitude about the rest of us.

W/E, just W/E, you guys. I'm having the painters in soon, so I'm allowed to be moody >8C

[identity profile] essbeejay.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:58 pm (UTC)(link)
"I know [this other pairing] is popular here." Yes? And? So? It's self-pitying comment mongering...

Oh Jesus Christ yes. Just post your fic and let it speak for itself. At least then you might be able to get me to read a bit of it before I figure out whether it's worth my time.

[identity profile] xjabooo.livejournal.com 2010-03-31 08:40 am (UTC)(link)
Speaking of fics being worthy of someone's time, I hate summaries that go, (a)"im not so gud at writing summerys bt plz jst read d fic i promis its gud!!" Or those that have good summaries, but go, (b) "NO FLAMES!!" because honestly:

(a) NO ONE WILL READ YOUR FIC IF YOU TYPE LIKE THAT. THAT'S MURDER TO THE EYES.
and (b) If I'm a reader, and I don't like the fic, I'll flame. I don't care what your summary says.

I do appreciate pardons, though. Like, (c) "[insert summary here]. Sorry, I'm not good with summaries. :P" or warnings like, (d) "[insert summary here]. WARNING: Sexual innuendo and references to rape." because:

(c) the fic still has a chance with me. If it looks like it has good spelling, etc., then I might just actually read it.
and (d) now I know what to expect. I hate it when the summaries don't have enough warning.

I guess this is unrelated, but I'm just throwing it out there. :]

[identity profile] crystallinearmy.livejournal.com 2010-03-31 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Were you reading my mind or something? 0.o Because that's exactly how I feel.

I also hate it when people start proofreading/revising their stories after they post it, and rewrite their summaries, "Lol, just fixing some mistakes I found. No new content." ~pulls hair out in frustration~

Also, if they put in a "CHAPTER [number] NOW UP!" SHFIOJDSOFIDJ Ugh. I know you updated your story! Otherwise, it wouldn't have magically popped up on the front page of PpG fanfics! :O *GASP* OMGZ NO WAYZZ!!1!!!ONE!!!1!!!2!!!ELEVEN!!!